LogoLogo
  • Getting Started in the VCI and GCI
    • About the Curation Interfaces
    • Account Creation and Login
      • Registration
      • Affiliations
      • Logging In
    • General Navigation
  • VCI Help
    • About Variant Curation
    • Selecting a Variant
    • The Evidence View
    • Starting an Interpretation
      • Interpretation mode view
      • Associating a variant with disease, mode of inheritance and specification document
        • Disease association
        • Mode of inheritance
        • Specification documents
    • Evaluating Criteria
      • Adding Curated Evidence
      • Case/Segregation Data
        • Adding Evidence Details
      • Functional Data
      • The Audit Trail
    • The Evaluation Summary
      • Viewing an Evaluation Summary
        • Modifying a Classification
      • Saving an Evaluation Summary
        • Record Statuses
        • Saving as a Provisional Interpretation
        • Saving as an Approved Interpretation
      • Viewing and Printing Summaries
    • Publishing from the VCI
      • Publishing to the ERepo
      • Publishing to ClinVar
    • Variant Prioritization
      • VP Access
      • Searching
      • The Filter View
      • Filters
      • Columns
      • The VP Data Pipeline
      • Data Output
  • GCI Help
    • About Gene-Disease Clinical Validity Curation
    • Creating a Gene-Disease Record
      • Creating a Free-Text Disease Identifier
    • Curation Central
    • Adding PubMed Articles
      • GCI Preprint Policy
    • Adding ClinVar Submissions
    • Evidence Collection: Overview
    • Evidence Collection: Genetic Evidence
      • Curating Group Information
      • Curating Family Information
      • Curating Individual Information
      • Curating Case-Control Information
      • Curating Variant Information
    • Evidence Collection: Experimental Evidence
      • Biochemical Function Evidence
      • Protein Interactions Evidence
      • Expression Evidence
      • Functional Alteration Evidence
      • Model Systems Evidence
      • Rescue Evidence
    • Previewing Curated Evidence
    • Saving, Reviewing and Approving Classifications
      • Saving the Summary Classification
      • Moving a Gene-Disease Record to Provisional Status
      • Approving a Gene-Disease Record
    • Publishing an Approved Gene-Disease Record
      • Editing the Disease Term of a Published Gene-Disease Record
      • Editing and Re-publishing a Published Summary
    • Recuration
    • GCI API
  • External Tools
    • Ontologies in the VCI and GCI
    • MONDO Search Help
    • HPO Search Help
  • More Information
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • ClinGen Resources
    • About Us
      • The Team
    • VCI Terms of Use, User Agreement
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Criteria placement & organization
  • Criteria evaluation options
  • Steps for evaluating a criterion or criteria:
Export as PDF
  1. VCI Help

Evaluating Criteria

PreviousSpecification documentsNextAdding Curated Evidence

Last updated 2 years ago

Criteria placement & organization

The ACMG criteria are grouped in the VCI according to the evidence required for their evaluation. To evaluate them curators must navigate to the appropriate tab:

BA1

BS1

PM2

Missense
Loss of Function
Silent & Intron
In-frame Indel

BP1

PP2

PP3

BP4

PM5

PS1

PVS1

BP7

BP3

PM4

PM1

BS3

PS3

BS2

PS4

BS4

PP1

PM6

PS2

BP2

PM3

BP5

PP4

Each of the VCI tabs with criteria codes also supports users in manually adding .

The Basic Information and Gene-centric tabs are for reference only. They do not contain criteria requiring evaluation or fields to add curated evidence.

Criteria evaluation options

The pull-downs allow the following choices:

  • Not Evaluated: The default state of an Evaluation is “Not Evaluated”. This is the appropriate selection when there is no evidence to evaluate or the particular criterion is not applicable for the variant.

  • Met: If the evidence meets the specified rules for a given criterion, the curator should select “Met”. Curators should provide an explanation note for all Met criteria.

  • Not Met: Not met can be applied if:

    • No evidence is identified for the criterion, OR

    • There is evidence, but it is not sufficient, OR

    • Another mutually exclusive criterion has been met.

    Curators should provide an explanation note for all Not Met criteria.

  • Strength: The strength of evaluation for a criterion can be adjusted by selecting a strength from the pull down menu for a specific criterion.

Steps for evaluating a criterion or criteria:

  1. Examine evidence associated with criteria being evaluated

  2. Select an evaluation for all criteria related to the evidence from the pull-down

  3. Enter an explanation in the free text box to support your selection

  4. Click Save

Correct the erroneous evaluation and then save to proceed.

Curation Checkboxes

At the bottom of each tab which includes criteria for evaluation, you will see the following checkbox:

If you have evaluated all of the evidence on a particular tab to your satisfaction, you can click the checkbox and a check will appear on the tab for your reference:

This is an optional tool available to help track your progress. It is not required and is not included in the evaluation summary.

Criteria Bar

As you save your evaluations, you will notice that the Criteria Bar will indicate which criteria have been “Met” (solid color background with white criteria code), “Not Met” (grey background with colored criteria code), or remain “Not Evaluated” (white background with colored criteria code).

Additionally, the Progress Bar will automatically calculate the pathogenicity each time you save or update an evaluation

Auto-calculated Classification

  1. Benign

  2. Likely benign

  3. Uncertain significance

  4. Pathogenic

  5. Likely pathogenic

See

Once the evaluation has been successfully saved, the interface will display:

When 2 (or more) criteria are opposites or cannot otherwise be “Met” at the same time, the save will not be successful and the interface will display:

The calculated classifications follow the and are as follows:

Curated Evidence
Standardized Text for ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panels
ACMG/AMP 5 tiers
Strength of criteria indicated in Progress Bar, but not Criteria Bar